Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-04-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Red and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2020) is much better than the HTC One A9, having an 81.5 score against 72.1. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a a bit heavier phone than HTC One A9, but both of them are equally thin. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a more powerful CPU than HTC One A9, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) features just a bit better looking screen than HTC One A9, although it has a quite smaller screen, a way lower display density and a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels. HTC One A9 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC One A9 counts with greater battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has 2150mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh. The iPhone SE (2020) takes much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better video quality.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.