Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-07-23 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black glare |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 3 is better than HTC One A9, with a score of 86.3 against 72.1. Although Asus ROG Phone 3 is noticeably newer than the HTC One A9, it's much thicker and a lot heavier. The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than HTC One A9, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a really larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Asus ROG Phone 3 has a better processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has 9 GB more RAM. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a very superior camera than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher video definition, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
HTC One A9 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Asus ROG Phone 3 features a much better battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has a 179% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.