Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2015-11-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is much better than HTC One A9's score of 72.1. The Google Pixel 3 design is noticeably newer, but just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than HTC One A9. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than HTC One A9, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2160px resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3 features a superior camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
HTC One A9 has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3 has greater battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 2915mAh battery size against 2150mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.