Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than the HTC One A9's 72.1 score. Even though Google Pixel 4 is notably newer than the HTC One A9, it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better looking display than HTC One A9, because it has a bit better count of pixels per screen inch, a little larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 features a quite superior processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM memory. HTC One A9 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4 has greater battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has a 30% bigger battery size. Google Pixel 4 features a superior camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a lesser MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Google Pixel 4 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.