Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the HTC One A9, getting a score of 82.9 against 72.1. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is newer than HTC One A9, it's heavier and a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better display than HTC One A9, because it has a little bit more pixels per screen inch, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a quite superior processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4 XL shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
HTC One A9 features much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a way better battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 72 percent larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.