Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| 2015-11-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than the HTC One A9's global score of 72.1. The LG V35 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than the HTC One A9, but it's just a bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior processing unit than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a little higher screen pixel density and a larger display. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior camera than HTC One A9, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a back facing camera with more mega-pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One A9, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2150mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.