Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is better than HTC One A9's overall score of 72.1. The LG V40 ThinQ is a way newer device than the HTC One A9, but it's heavier and a little bit thicker. The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than HTC One A9, because it has a larger screen, a bit greater number of pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC One A9, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots much better videos and photos than HTC One A9, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a much larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.