Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than HTC One A9, having an 85.3 score against 72.1. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's body is noticeably newer and notably thinner than the HTC One A9's, although it's incredibly heavier. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a quite superior processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM memory.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a little more vivid display than HTC One A9, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a way larger display and a lot better resolution of 1892 x 2688. HTC One A9 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a superior camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a much longer battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity against 2150mAh.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 costs a little more than the HTC One A9, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.