Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is a lot better than HTC One A9, having a overall score of 89.6 against 72.1. The Motorola edge design is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than the HTC One A9. Motorola edge counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The HTC One A9 has a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. The Motorola edge has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola edge counts with a way better battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2150mAh. Motorola edge features a much better camera than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Motorola edge is a bit more expensive than the HTC One A9, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.