Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is better than the HTC One A9's 72.1 score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is much newer than the HTC One A9's, but it's thicker and incredibly heavier. The HTC One A9 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than HTC One A9, because although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way larger screen. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 2150mAh. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than HTC One A9, because it has a way better video resolution, a bigger aperture and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.