Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than HTC One A9's score of 72.1. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is noticeably newer, but noticeably heavier and a bit thicker than HTC One A9. HTC One A9 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper display than HTC One A9, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior storage for games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2150mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a much bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.