Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a lot better than the HTC One A9's 72.1 global score. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is noticeably newer than HTC One A9, it's thicker and notably heavier. HTC One A9 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than HTC One A9, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much better video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 109% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.