Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is better than HTC One A9, having an 80.8 score against 72.1. Although Nokia XR20 is a lot newer than the HTC One A9, it's a lot thicker and incredibly heavier. The Nokia XR20 features a bit better looking screen than HTC One A9, because although it has a little bit worse pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a really larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Nokia XR20 counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Nokia XR20 features a bit faster processor than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 has a much longer battery life than HTC One A9, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity. Nokia XR20 has a lot better camera than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has higher video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and a camera with way more megapixels.
Nokia XR20 costs a bit more than HTC One A9, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.