Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a lot better than HTC One A9, having an 86.6 score against 72.1. The Galaxy A50s is a a lot newer phone than the HTC One A9, although it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A50s has a screen that's very similar to HTC One A9's display, because although the Galaxy A50s has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A50s has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50s features a bit better processing unit than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a superior battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A50s shoots a lot better photos and videos than HTC One A9, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Galaxy A50s also has a much better (4K) video definition and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.