Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is a lot better than HTC One A9's score of 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a extremely newer phone than HTC One A9, but it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. The HTC One A9 and the Galaxy A51 5G count with very similar displays, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit inferior pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy A51 5G features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a greater camera than HTC One A9, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 109 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.