Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than HTC One A9, getting a 91.1 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction is much newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than HTC One A9. Galaxy A52s features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s and HTC One A9 both have quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger screen. The Galaxy A52s features a very superior camera than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Galaxy A52s counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A52s counts with a superior battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2150mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.