Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than the HTC One A9's global score of 72.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and extremely heavier than HTC One A9. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a display that's just as good as HTC One A9's display, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a quite lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a much bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC One A9, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures way better photos and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has a 109 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs more money than the HTC One A9, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.