Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than HTC One A9, getting an 87.7 score against 72.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is a lot newer than HTC One A9, it's much thicker and way heavier. Galaxy M51 has a little bit better processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC One A9 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy M51 has a much better camera than HTC One A9, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy M51 features more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2150mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.