Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than HTC One A9, getting a general score of 90.8 against 72.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is noticeably newer than HTC One A9, it is thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy Note 20 has a screen that is just as good as HTC One A9's display, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a really larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a way better camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a way better video quality.
HTC One A9 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 2150mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more than the HTC One A9, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.