Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than HTC One A9's general score of 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone than the HTC One A9, although it's a bit thicker and a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better CPU than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than HTC One A9, because it has a lot larger display, a much higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little higher pixel density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher resolution camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than HTC One A9, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.