Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is much better than the HTC One A9's general score of 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a incredibly older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than HTC One A9. The Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid display than HTC One A9, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than HTC One A9, because although it has 4 less cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots clearer pictures and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a 13 mega pixels back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a way better video resolution.
HTC One A9 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.