Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
SM-N910U, SM-N910C, SM-N910FD| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2014-09-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 340.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Exynos Octa 7 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 4.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is just a bit better than the HTC One A9, with a global score of 79.2 against 72.1. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 counts with a brighter display than HTC One A9, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit higher pixel number in each inch of display.
HTC One A9 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC One A9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 4 has a bit faster processing unit than HTC One A9. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 3 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 features a superior camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, it also counts with a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Galaxy Note 4 has a much better battery life than HTC One A9, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity against 2150mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note 4 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.