| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2014-09-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 4.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy Note 4 is better than the HTC One A9, having an 81.6 score against 72.1. Even though Galaxy Note 4 is a better cellphone than the HTC One A9, we must tell that it is also older, heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has a more vivid display than HTC One A9, because it has a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a quite larger display and a bit better display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has a faster processing unit than HTC One A9, because although it has 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 also counts with a GPU. Galaxy Note 4 has a better camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with more MP.
HTC One A9 counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 4, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory, the HTC One A9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 4 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.