Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the HTC One A9, having a general score of 86.2 against 72.1. Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is much newer than HTC One A9's, but it is thicker and a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a screen that's just as good as the screen in HTC One A9, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a way bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a superior memory for applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a better processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a way better battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2150mAh. Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.