Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is a bit better than HTC One A9's 72.1 score. Although it's the best device we compare here, the Galaxy Note3 is a way older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker device than HTC One A9. The HTC One A9 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the HTC One A9 also counts with a little greater display density.
HTC One A9 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note3 counts with just a little better processing power than HTC One A9, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with a slightly better camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a 13 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a lot higher video resolution. Galaxy Note3 has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 49% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.