Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is a lot better than the HTC One A9's 72.1 overall score. Galaxy S10's construction is notably newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the HTC One A9. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little sharper display than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a just a bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a superior processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S10 captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way larger aperture for better low light captures. Galaxy S10 has a much longer battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 58 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.