Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than the HTC One A9, having a score of 93.6 against 72.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot newer than HTC One A9, it is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better display than HTC One A9, because it has a lot bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a quite better screen density.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a quite better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures much better pictures and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture and a way better video quality. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2150mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.