Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a lot better than the HTC One A9's general score of 72.1. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is noticeably newer, but just a bit thicker and extremely heavier than HTC One A9. The HTC One A9 and the Galaxy S10 Lite both have very similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than HTC One A9, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite captures way better videos and photos than HTC One A9, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a really longer battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.