Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than HTC One A9's overall score of 72.1. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's body is notably newer than the HTC One A9's, although it's thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy S20 FE has a superior hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better looking screen than HTC One A9, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger screen. Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has a 109% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a greater camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE costs a little more money than the HTC One A9, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.