Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than HTC One A9, having a 98 score against 72.1. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is much newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than the HTC One A9. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better screen than HTC One A9, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a really bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a way higher video quality. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery duration than HTC One A9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the HTC One A9, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.