Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than the HTC One A9's 72.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer than the HTC One A9's, but it's a lot heavier and thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than HTC One A9, because it has a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a lot larger screen and a little bit better display pixel density.
The HTC One A9 has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than the HTC One A9, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.