Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-06 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the HTC One A9, getting a general score of 90.7 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the HTC One A9. HTC One A9 has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than HTC One A9, because it has a much larger screen, a little bit higher pixels density and a much better 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 133 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than HTC One A9, because it has a back camera with a lot better resolution, a larger aperture and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.