Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is much better than HTC One A9's overall score of 72.1. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is noticeably newer than the HTC One A9, it's heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a display that's very similar to HTC One A9's display, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little worse display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The HTC One A9 has a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better camera than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a camera with a much higher 25 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a really longer battery life than HTC One A9, because it has an 88% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.