Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than the HTC One A9's global score of 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a incredibly newer and a little thinner cellphone than HTC One A9, although it's also much heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better hardware performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better display than HTC One A9, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit more memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots much clearer videos and photos than HTC One A9, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a larger diafragm aperture. Galaxy Z Flip features a much better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than the HTC One A9, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.