Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a lot better than HTC One A9's 72.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly newer and a little bit thinner device than the HTC One A9, although it is noticeably heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior processor than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid screen than HTC One A9, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more than the HTC One A9, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.