Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.8 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the HTC One A9, with a 90.6 score against 72.1. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One A9's, although it's also a lot heavier. The HTC One A9 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has slightly more memory to install games and applications than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a greater processing power than HTC One A9, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
The HTC One A9 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a higher 13 mega-pixels resolution camera and a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and video. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 2150mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.