Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is better than HTC One A9's score of 72.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is incredibly newer, but thicker and way heavier than the HTC One A9. HTC One A9 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
HTC One A9 features just a bit more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little faster processing unit than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures greater photos and videos than HTC One A9, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has a 133 percent greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.