Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 6.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is much better than the HTC One A9's 71.3 score. Despite being the best we are comparing, Google Pixel 3a is a a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the HTC One A9. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while HTC One A9 has Android 6.0, so it counts with some additional features.
The HTC One A9 features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller display, they both have the same display pixels density. HTC One A9 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 3a features a faster CPU than HTC One A9, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Google Pixel 3a features a very superior battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2150mAh. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little bit better camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3a is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.