Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 6.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is much better than the HTC One A9's general score of 71.3. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the newer 10 version while HTC One A9 has Android 6.0, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance enhancements. Even being the best we are comparing, the LG V40 ThinQ construction is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than HTC One A9.
The HTC One A9 features a slightly better display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller screen. The LG V40 ThinQ features more memory for games and applications than HTC One A9, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with an extremely better processor than HTC One A9, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 3 GB more RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG V40 ThinQ features a really longer battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little more expensive than HTC One A9, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.