Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 13 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is better than HTC One (M8)'s overall score of 71.9. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is somewhat heavier than the HTC One (M8), it's just a bit thinner and way newer. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version and HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0, so it offers some nice extra features.
The HTC One (M8) features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 4 lesser cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The HTC One (M8) features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos, a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a lot bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has much more storage to store more games and applications than HTC One (M8), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has a 77 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.