Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminium | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a lot better than HTC One (M8)'s 71.9 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version, providing some nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is incredibly newer and a little thinner than HTC One (M8)'s, but it is also somewhat heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than HTC One (M8), because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The HTC One (M8) counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores and 10 GB less RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC One (M8), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.