Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-03-25 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminium | -- |
| $ 325.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the HTC One (M8)'s 71.9 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z Force has the newer 7.0 Nougat version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and optimized performance. Even though the Moto Z Force is a bit heavier than the HTC One (M8), it's thinner and a lot newer.
The HTC One (M8) features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity per inch in the display, a bit smaller display and a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The Moto Z Force counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than HTC One (M8), because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC One (M8) features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One (M8) also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola Moto Z Force takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC One (M8), because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Moto Z Force has longer battery performance than HTC One (M8), because it has a 35% bigger battery capacity.
Moto Z Force is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.