Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| $ 325.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is much better than HTC One (M8), with a 79.8 score against 71.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0. Motorola One Hyper's design is way newer and a little thinner than HTC One (M8)'s, although it's noticeably heavier.
HTC One (M8) counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The HTC One (M8) has a brighter display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount per inch of display.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much better storage to install applications and games than HTC One (M8), because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has a very superior battery performance than HTC One (M8), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper has a lot better camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Motorola One Hyper is a little more expensive than the HTC One (M8), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.