Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Meteor grey |
| Aluminium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is better than HTC One (M8)'s overall score of 71.9. Although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is noticeably heavier than the HTC One (M8), it's just a little bit thinner and also noticeably newer. These phones work with Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has 10 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version, providing you some additional features and optimized performance.
The HTC One (M8) features a more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels per inch of display. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than HTC One (M8), because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 32 GB more internal memory.
HTC One (M8) counts with a bit faster processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a very superior camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a lot higher video definition, a lot better 64 MP resolution back camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC One (M8), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One (M8). If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the HTC One (M8), giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.