Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-03-25 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Blue |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is slightly better than HTC One (M8), getting a general score of 76.4 against 71.9. Nokia 9 PureView is a way newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than HTC One (M8), although it is also just a little bit heavier. Nokia 9 PureView has a little better performance than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
HTC One (M8) features a bit sharper display than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a bit inferior pixels quantity per display inch. The Nokia 9 PureView features a superior camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with much more MP, a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
Nokia 9 PureView has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One (M8), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with greater battery duration than HTC One (M8), because it has a 28% bigger battery size.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One (M8), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One (M8). If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC One (M8), and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.