Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Prism cube black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is way better than the HTC One (M8)'s global score of 71.9. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version, so it offers some extra features. The Galaxy A51 5G body is newer and just a little thinner, but somewhat heavier than HTC One (M8).
HTC One (M8) features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. HTC One (M8) counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A51 5G captures greater photos and videos than HTC One (M8), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a way better (4K) video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One (M8), because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a bit more expensive than the HTC One (M8), but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.