Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is much better than the HTC One (M8)'s 71.9 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. Galaxy A52s's design is much newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One (M8)'s, although it is heavier.
HTC One (M8) counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One (M8), because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The HTC One (M8) and the Samsung Galaxy A52s both count with quite similar processors, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a way better battery life than HTC One (M8), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A52s features a very superior camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a way better video definition, a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.