Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-03-25 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is slightly better than the HTC One (M8)'s global score of 71.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A70 has 10 version and HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0. Galaxy A70 is a newer and thinner cellphone than the HTC One (M8), but it is also somewhat heavier.
The HTC One (M8) features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The HTC One (M8) counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra GPU.
The HTC One (M8) counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments and a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the HTC One (M8) also counts with faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has a way better battery life than HTC One (M8), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Galaxy A70 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.