Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminium | -- |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the HTC One (M8), with a general score of 88.1 against 71.9. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a a lot heavier phone than HTC One (M8), but both are 0.37inches thick.
The HTC One (M8) has just a bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount per display inch. HTC One (M8) features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One (M8) also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC One (M8), because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery lifetime than HTC One (M8), because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
Galaxy F62 features a lot better camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos, a much larger sensor, a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.