Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than HTC One (M8), having a 98.9 score against 71.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is heavier than HTC One (M8), it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The HTC One (M8) features a little sharper display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a lot more MP back facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater memory for applications and games than HTC One (M8), because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior battery life than HTC One (M8), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than the HTC One (M8), but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.